tasq/node_modules/agentic-flow/docs/plans/agent-booster/03-BENCHMARKS.md

617 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Agent Booster: Benchmark Methodology
## 🎯 Benchmark Goals
1. **Establish baseline** - Measure Morph LLM performance with Anthropic models
2. **Measure speedup** - Quantify Agent Booster performance improvements
3. **Validate accuracy** - Ensure quality is maintained or improved
4. **Calculate savings** - Demonstrate cost reduction
5. **Identify limitations** - Understand where Agent Booster excels vs struggles
## 📊 Benchmark Suite Structure
```
benchmarks/
├── datasets/ # Test code samples
│ ├── javascript/
│ │ ├── simple/ # 40 samples
│ │ ├── medium/ # 40 samples
│ │ └── complex/ # 20 samples
│ ├── typescript/
│ ├── python/
│ └── rust/
├── baselines/ # Morph LLM baselines
│ ├── morph-claude-sonnet-4.ts
│ ├── morph-claude-opus-4.ts
│ └── morph-claude-haiku-4.ts
├── agent-booster/ # Agent Booster tests
│ ├── native-addon.ts
│ ├── wasm.ts
│ └── typescript-fallback.ts
├── results/ # Benchmark outputs
│ ├── raw/ # Raw JSON results
│ ├── analysis/ # Processed results
│ └── reports/ # HTML/PDF reports
└── scripts/
├── run-all.sh # Run full suite
├── run-baseline.sh # Morph LLM only
├── run-agent-booster.sh # Agent Booster only
├── compare.ts # Generate comparison
└── visualize.ts # Create charts
```
## 📝 Test Datasets
### Simple Edits (40 samples per language)
**Characteristics:**
- Single function/method modifications
- Clear, unambiguous edit descriptions
- < 50 lines of code
- Expected accuracy: 99%+
**Examples:**
1. **Add parameter**
```typescript
// Original
function greet(name: string) {
return `Hello, ${name}!`;
}
// Edit: "add optional greeting parameter with default 'Hello'"
// Expected
function greet(name: string, greeting: string = 'Hello') {
return `${greeting}, ${name}!`;
}
```
2. **Add error handling**
```typescript
// Original
function parseJSON(text: string) {
return JSON.parse(text);
}
// Edit: "add try-catch error handling"
// Expected
function parseJSON(text: string) {
try {
return JSON.parse(text);
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to parse JSON:', error);
return null;
}
}
```
3. **Rename variable**
```typescript
// Edit: "rename 'data' to 'userData'"
```
4. **Add return type**
```typescript
// Edit: "add explicit return type annotation"
```
5. **Add JSDoc comment**
```typescript
// Edit: "add JSDoc documentation"
```
### Medium Edits (40 samples per language)
**Characteristics:**
- Multi-line function bodies
- Some ambiguity in edit description
- 50-200 lines of code
- Expected accuracy: 95%+
**Examples:**
1. **Convert to async/await**
```typescript
// Edit: "convert promises to async/await"
```
2. **Add input validation**
```typescript
// Edit: "add parameter validation for email format"
```
3. **Extract helper function**
```typescript
// Edit: "extract password hashing logic into separate function"
```
4. **Add type safety**
```typescript
// Edit: "replace 'any' types with proper types"
```
### Complex Edits (20 samples per language)
**Characteristics:**
- Architectural changes
- Multiple functions affected
- 200+ lines of code
- Expected accuracy: 85%+
**Examples:**
1. **Refactor to design pattern**
```typescript
// Edit: "refactor to use Strategy pattern for authentication"
```
2. **Add dependency injection**
```typescript
// Edit: "convert to use dependency injection for database"
```
3. **Extract class**
```typescript
// Edit: "extract user validation into separate class"
```
## ⚡ Baseline: Morph LLM Performance
### Test Configuration
```typescript
// benchmarks/baselines/morph-claude-sonnet-4.ts
import Anthropic from '@anthropic-ai/sdk';
const MORPH_API_KEY = process.env.MORPH_API_KEY;
const MORPH_BASE_URL = 'https://api.morphllm.com/v1';
interface MorphBenchmarkConfig {
model: 'claude-sonnet-4' | 'claude-opus-4' | 'claude-haiku-4';
morphModel: 'morph-v3-fast' | 'morph-v3-large';
dataset: string;
iterations: number;
}
async function benchmarkMorph(config: MorphBenchmarkConfig) {
const client = new Anthropic({
apiKey: MORPH_API_KEY,
baseURL: MORPH_BASE_URL,
});
const results = [];
const dataset = loadDataset(config.dataset);
for (const sample of dataset) {
for (let i = 0; i < config.iterations; i++) {
const startTime = performance.now();
const response = await client.messages.create({
model: config.morphModel,
max_tokens: 4096,
messages: [{
role: 'user',
content: formatMorphPrompt(sample.original, sample.edit),
}],
});
const latency = performance.now() - startTime;
const mergedCode = response.content[0].text;
// Validate result
const isCorrect = validateResult(mergedCode, sample.expected);
const syntaxValid = checkSyntax(mergedCode, sample.language);
// Calculate cost
const cost = calculateCost(response.usage);
results.push({
sample_id: sample.id,
iteration: i,
model: config.model,
morph_model: config.morphModel,
latency_ms: latency,
correct: isCorrect,
syntax_valid: syntaxValid,
cost_usd: cost,
tokens_input: response.usage.input_tokens,
tokens_output: response.usage.output_tokens,
timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
});
// Rate limiting
await sleep(1000); // 1 req/sec to be safe
}
}
return aggregateResults(results);
}
function formatMorphPrompt(original: string, edit: string): string {
return `<instruction>${edit}</instruction>
<code>${original}</code>
<update>Apply the edit</update>`;
}
function calculateCost(usage: { input_tokens: number; output_tokens: number }): number {
// Claude Sonnet 4 pricing (example)
const inputCost = (usage.input_tokens / 1000) * 0.003;
const outputCost = (usage.output_tokens / 1000) * 0.015;
return inputCost + outputCost;
}
```
### Anthropic Models to Test
#### 1. Claude Sonnet 4 (claude-sonnet-4-20250514)
- **Use Case**: Production default (best balance)
- **Expected Performance**: 6000ms latency, 98% accuracy
- **Cost**: ~$0.01 per edit
#### 2. Claude Opus 4 (claude-opus-4-20250514)
- **Use Case**: Maximum accuracy
- **Expected Performance**: 8000ms latency, 99% accuracy
- **Cost**: ~$0.02 per edit
#### 3. Claude Haiku 4 (claude-haiku-4-20250320)
- **Use Case**: Speed-optimized
- **Expected Performance**: 3000ms latency, 96% accuracy
- **Cost**: ~$0.005 per edit
### Morph Model Variants
#### 1. morph-v3-large
- **Use Case**: Best accuracy
- **Expected**: Slower but more accurate
#### 2. morph-v3-fast
- **Use Case**: Speed-optimized
- **Expected**: Faster but slightly less accurate
## ⚡ Agent Booster Benchmarks
### Test Configuration
```typescript
// benchmarks/agent-booster/native-addon.ts
import { AgentBooster } from 'agent-booster';
interface AgentBoosterBenchmarkConfig {
model: 'jina-code-v2' | 'all-MiniLM-L6-v2';
dataset: string;
iterations: number;
variant: 'native' | 'wasm' | 'typescript';
}
async function benchmarkAgentBooster(config: AgentBoosterBenchmarkConfig) {
const booster = new AgentBooster({
model: config.model,
confidenceThreshold: 0.0, // Disable fallback for pure benchmark
});
const results = [];
const dataset = loadDataset(config.dataset);
for (const sample of dataset) {
for (let i = 0; i < config.iterations; i++) {
const startTime = performance.now();
try {
const result = await booster.applyEdit({
originalCode: sample.original,
editSnippet: sample.edit,
language: sample.language,
});
const latency = performance.now() - startTime;
// Validate result
const isCorrect = validateResult(result.mergedCode, sample.expected);
const syntaxValid = checkSyntax(result.mergedCode, sample.language);
results.push({
sample_id: sample.id,
iteration: i,
variant: config.variant,
model: config.model,
latency_ms: latency,
correct: isCorrect,
syntax_valid: syntaxValid,
confidence: result.confidence,
strategy: result.strategy,
cost_usd: 0, // Always $0
timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
});
} catch (error) {
results.push({
sample_id: sample.id,
iteration: i,
variant: config.variant,
error: error.message,
latency_ms: performance.now() - startTime,
correct: false,
syntax_valid: false,
});
}
}
}
return aggregateResults(results);
}
```
### Variants to Test
#### 1. Native Addon (napi-rs)
- **Platform**: Node.js on native hardware
- **Expected**: Fastest (30-50ms)
#### 2. WASM
- **Platform**: Node.js with WASM
- **Expected**: Medium (50-100ms)
#### 3. TypeScript Fallback
- **Platform**: Pure TypeScript (no Rust)
- **Expected**: Slower (100-200ms)
## 📊 Metrics to Collect
### Performance Metrics
```typescript
interface PerformanceMetrics {
// Latency
latency_p50: number; // Median
latency_p95: number; // 95th percentile
latency_p99: number; // 99th percentile
latency_max: number; // Maximum
latency_min: number; // Minimum
latency_mean: number; // Average
latency_stddev: number; // Standard deviation
// Throughput
throughput_edits_per_sec: number;
throughput_tokens_per_sec: number;
// Memory
memory_peak_mb: number;
memory_avg_mb: number;
// Startup
cold_start_ms: number;
warm_start_ms: number;
}
```
### Accuracy Metrics
```typescript
interface AccuracyMetrics {
// Overall
accuracy_exact_match: number; // Exact code match
accuracy_semantic_match: number; // Semantically equivalent
accuracy_syntax_valid: number; // Valid syntax
// By complexity
accuracy_simple: number; // Simple edits
accuracy_medium: number; // Medium edits
accuracy_complex: number; // Complex edits
// Confidence correlation
confidence_avg: number;
confidence_accuracy_correlation: number;
// Error rates
false_positive_rate: number;
false_negative_rate: number;
syntax_error_rate: number;
}
```
### Cost Metrics
```typescript
interface CostMetrics {
cost_per_edit: number;
cost_total: number;
cost_saved_vs_baseline: number;
cost_saved_percentage: number;
// Token usage (for LLM baselines)
tokens_per_edit_avg: number;
tokens_input_avg: number;
tokens_output_avg: number;
}
```
## 📈 Comparison Analysis
### Statistical Tests
```typescript
interface ComparisonAnalysis {
// Speed comparison
speedup_factor: number; // Agent Booster vs Morph
speedup_confidence_interval: [number, number];
speedup_p_value: number; // T-test significance
// Accuracy comparison
accuracy_difference: number; // Percentage points
accuracy_significance: boolean; // Statistically significant?
// Cost savings
cost_savings_per_edit: number;
cost_savings_per_1000_edits: number;
break_even_point: number; // Number of edits to break even
// Quality metrics
quality_score: number; // Weighted score (accuracy + speed)
recommended_use_cases: string[];
}
```
### Visualization
```typescript
// Generate comparison charts
async function generateCharts(results: BenchmarkResults) {
await generateLatencyChart(results);
await generateAccuracyChart(results);
await generateCostChart(results);
await generateConfidenceDistribution(results);
await generateComplexityBreakdown(results);
}
```
## 🎯 Benchmark Execution Plan
### Phase 1: Baseline (Week 1)
```bash
# 1. Setup Morph LLM account and get API key
export MORPH_API_KEY=sk-morph-xxx
# 2. Prepare datasets
npm run benchmark:prepare-datasets
# 3. Run Morph + Claude Sonnet 4 baseline
npm run benchmark:baseline -- --model claude-sonnet-4 --iterations 3
# 4. Run Morph + Claude Opus 4 baseline
npm run benchmark:baseline -- --model claude-opus-4 --iterations 3
# 5. Run Morph + Claude Haiku 4 baseline
npm run benchmark:baseline -- --model claude-haiku-4 --iterations 3
# 6. Analyze baseline results
npm run benchmark:analyze-baseline
```
**Expected Duration**: 8-12 hours (100 samples × 3 iterations × 3 models × 6s)
**Expected Cost**: ~$30-50 (300 edits × $0.01-0.02 per edit)
### Phase 2: Agent Booster (Week 2)
```bash
# 1. Build Agent Booster
cargo build --release
npm run build
# 2. Download embedding models
npm run download-models
# 3. Run native addon benchmarks
npm run benchmark:agent-booster -- --variant native --iterations 10
# 4. Run WASM benchmarks
npm run benchmark:agent-booster -- --variant wasm --iterations 10
# 5. Run TypeScript fallback benchmarks
npm run benchmark:agent-booster -- --variant typescript --iterations 10
# 6. Analyze Agent Booster results
npm run benchmark:analyze-agent-booster
```
**Expected Duration**: 1-2 hours (100 samples × 10 iterations × 3 variants × 50ms)
**Expected Cost**: $0
### Phase 3: Comparison (Week 3)
```bash
# 1. Generate comparison analysis
npm run benchmark:compare
# 2. Generate charts and visualizations
npm run benchmark:visualize
# 3. Generate HTML report
npm run benchmark:report
# 4. Publish results
npm run benchmark:publish
```
## 📋 Expected Results
### Latency Comparison
| Metric | Morph + Sonnet 4 | Agent Booster (Native) | Improvement |
|--------|------------------|------------------------|-------------|
| **p50** | 5,800ms | 35ms | **166x faster** |
| **p95** | 8,200ms | 52ms | **158x faster** |
| **p99** | 12,000ms | 85ms | **141x faster** |
| **Max** | 18,000ms | 150ms | **120x faster** |
### Accuracy Comparison
| Complexity | Morph + Sonnet 4 | Agent Booster | Difference |
|------------|------------------|---------------|------------|
| **Simple** | 99.2% | 98.5% | -0.7% |
| **Medium** | 97.8% | 96.2% | -1.6% |
| **Complex** | 96.1% | 93.8% | -2.3% |
| **Overall** | 98.0% | 96.8% | -1.2% |
### Cost Comparison (1000 edits)
| Solution | Total Cost | Cost per Edit | Savings |
|----------|-----------|---------------|---------|
| **Morph + Sonnet 4** | $10.00 | $0.010 | - |
| **Morph + Opus 4** | $20.00 | $0.020 | - |
| **Agent Booster** | $0.00 | $0.000 | **100%** |
### Recommended Configuration
Based on benchmarks, recommend:
```typescript
// For maximum performance
const config = {
primaryMethod: 'agent-booster',
model: 'jina-code-v2',
confidenceThreshold: 0.65,
fallbackToMorph: true,
morphModel: 'claude-sonnet-4'
};
// Expected results with 1000 edits:
// - 850 edits via Agent Booster (85%, avg 40ms, $0)
// - 150 edits via Morph fallback (15%, avg 6000ms, $1.50)
// - Overall avg latency: 934ms (vs 6000ms pure Morph)
// - Overall cost: $1.50 (vs $10 pure Morph)
// - 6.4x faster, 85% cost savings
```
## 📊 Benchmark Report Template
```markdown
# Agent Booster Benchmark Report
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Version**: agent-booster@0.1.0
**Dataset**: 100 samples (40 simple, 40 medium, 20 complex)
**Iterations**: 3 per sample (baseline), 10 per sample (Agent Booster)
## Executive Summary
- **Speed**: Agent Booster is **166x faster** than Morph + Claude Sonnet 4
- **Accuracy**: 96.8% vs 98.0% (-1.2 percentage points)
- **Cost**: **100% savings** ($0 vs $0.01 per edit)
- **Recommendation**: Use Agent Booster with fallback for best ROI
## Detailed Results
[Charts and tables here]
## Conclusions
[Analysis and recommendations]
```