# Agent Booster: Benchmark Methodology
## 🎯 Benchmark Goals
1. **Establish baseline** - Measure Morph LLM performance with Anthropic models
2. **Measure speedup** - Quantify Agent Booster performance improvements
3. **Validate accuracy** - Ensure quality is maintained or improved
4. **Calculate savings** - Demonstrate cost reduction
5. **Identify limitations** - Understand where Agent Booster excels vs struggles
## 📊 Benchmark Suite Structure
```
benchmarks/
├── datasets/ # Test code samples
│ ├── javascript/
│ │ ├── simple/ # 40 samples
│ │ ├── medium/ # 40 samples
│ │ └── complex/ # 20 samples
│ ├── typescript/
│ ├── python/
│ └── rust/
│
├── baselines/ # Morph LLM baselines
│ ├── morph-claude-sonnet-4.ts
│ ├── morph-claude-opus-4.ts
│ └── morph-claude-haiku-4.ts
│
├── agent-booster/ # Agent Booster tests
│ ├── native-addon.ts
│ ├── wasm.ts
│ └── typescript-fallback.ts
│
├── results/ # Benchmark outputs
│ ├── raw/ # Raw JSON results
│ ├── analysis/ # Processed results
│ └── reports/ # HTML/PDF reports
│
└── scripts/
├── run-all.sh # Run full suite
├── run-baseline.sh # Morph LLM only
├── run-agent-booster.sh # Agent Booster only
├── compare.ts # Generate comparison
└── visualize.ts # Create charts
```
## 📝 Test Datasets
### Simple Edits (40 samples per language)
**Characteristics:**
- Single function/method modifications
- Clear, unambiguous edit descriptions
- < 50 lines of code
- Expected accuracy: 99%+
**Examples:**
1. **Add parameter**
```typescript
// Original
function greet(name: string) {
return `Hello, ${name}!`;
}
// Edit: "add optional greeting parameter with default 'Hello'"
// Expected
function greet(name: string, greeting: string = 'Hello') {
return `${greeting}, ${name}!`;
}
```
2. **Add error handling**
```typescript
// Original
function parseJSON(text: string) {
return JSON.parse(text);
}
// Edit: "add try-catch error handling"
// Expected
function parseJSON(text: string) {
try {
return JSON.parse(text);
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to parse JSON:', error);
return null;
}
}
```
3. **Rename variable**
```typescript
// Edit: "rename 'data' to 'userData'"
```
4. **Add return type**
```typescript
// Edit: "add explicit return type annotation"
```
5. **Add JSDoc comment**
```typescript
// Edit: "add JSDoc documentation"
```
### Medium Edits (40 samples per language)
**Characteristics:**
- Multi-line function bodies
- Some ambiguity in edit description
- 50-200 lines of code
- Expected accuracy: 95%+
**Examples:**
1. **Convert to async/await**
```typescript
// Edit: "convert promises to async/await"
```
2. **Add input validation**
```typescript
// Edit: "add parameter validation for email format"
```
3. **Extract helper function**
```typescript
// Edit: "extract password hashing logic into separate function"
```
4. **Add type safety**
```typescript
// Edit: "replace 'any' types with proper types"
```
### Complex Edits (20 samples per language)
**Characteristics:**
- Architectural changes
- Multiple functions affected
- 200+ lines of code
- Expected accuracy: 85%+
**Examples:**
1. **Refactor to design pattern**
```typescript
// Edit: "refactor to use Strategy pattern for authentication"
```
2. **Add dependency injection**
```typescript
// Edit: "convert to use dependency injection for database"
```
3. **Extract class**
```typescript
// Edit: "extract user validation into separate class"
```
## ⚡ Baseline: Morph LLM Performance
### Test Configuration
```typescript
// benchmarks/baselines/morph-claude-sonnet-4.ts
import Anthropic from '@anthropic-ai/sdk';
const MORPH_API_KEY = process.env.MORPH_API_KEY;
const MORPH_BASE_URL = 'https://api.morphllm.com/v1';
interface MorphBenchmarkConfig {
model: 'claude-sonnet-4' | 'claude-opus-4' | 'claude-haiku-4';
morphModel: 'morph-v3-fast' | 'morph-v3-large';
dataset: string;
iterations: number;
}
async function benchmarkMorph(config: MorphBenchmarkConfig) {
const client = new Anthropic({
apiKey: MORPH_API_KEY,
baseURL: MORPH_BASE_URL,
});
const results = [];
const dataset = loadDataset(config.dataset);
for (const sample of dataset) {
for (let i = 0; i < config.iterations; i++) {
const startTime = performance.now();
const response = await client.messages.create({
model: config.morphModel,
max_tokens: 4096,
messages: [{
role: 'user',
content: formatMorphPrompt(sample.original, sample.edit),
}],
});
const latency = performance.now() - startTime;
const mergedCode = response.content[0].text;
// Validate result
const isCorrect = validateResult(mergedCode, sample.expected);
const syntaxValid = checkSyntax(mergedCode, sample.language);
// Calculate cost
const cost = calculateCost(response.usage);
results.push({
sample_id: sample.id,
iteration: i,
model: config.model,
morph_model: config.morphModel,
latency_ms: latency,
correct: isCorrect,
syntax_valid: syntaxValid,
cost_usd: cost,
tokens_input: response.usage.input_tokens,
tokens_output: response.usage.output_tokens,
timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
});
// Rate limiting
await sleep(1000); // 1 req/sec to be safe
}
}
return aggregateResults(results);
}
function formatMorphPrompt(original: string, edit: string): string {
return `${edit}
${original}
Apply the edit`;
}
function calculateCost(usage: { input_tokens: number; output_tokens: number }): number {
// Claude Sonnet 4 pricing (example)
const inputCost = (usage.input_tokens / 1000) * 0.003;
const outputCost = (usage.output_tokens / 1000) * 0.015;
return inputCost + outputCost;
}
```
### Anthropic Models to Test
#### 1. Claude Sonnet 4 (claude-sonnet-4-20250514)
- **Use Case**: Production default (best balance)
- **Expected Performance**: 6000ms latency, 98% accuracy
- **Cost**: ~$0.01 per edit
#### 2. Claude Opus 4 (claude-opus-4-20250514)
- **Use Case**: Maximum accuracy
- **Expected Performance**: 8000ms latency, 99% accuracy
- **Cost**: ~$0.02 per edit
#### 3. Claude Haiku 4 (claude-haiku-4-20250320)
- **Use Case**: Speed-optimized
- **Expected Performance**: 3000ms latency, 96% accuracy
- **Cost**: ~$0.005 per edit
### Morph Model Variants
#### 1. morph-v3-large
- **Use Case**: Best accuracy
- **Expected**: Slower but more accurate
#### 2. morph-v3-fast
- **Use Case**: Speed-optimized
- **Expected**: Faster but slightly less accurate
## ⚡ Agent Booster Benchmarks
### Test Configuration
```typescript
// benchmarks/agent-booster/native-addon.ts
import { AgentBooster } from 'agent-booster';
interface AgentBoosterBenchmarkConfig {
model: 'jina-code-v2' | 'all-MiniLM-L6-v2';
dataset: string;
iterations: number;
variant: 'native' | 'wasm' | 'typescript';
}
async function benchmarkAgentBooster(config: AgentBoosterBenchmarkConfig) {
const booster = new AgentBooster({
model: config.model,
confidenceThreshold: 0.0, // Disable fallback for pure benchmark
});
const results = [];
const dataset = loadDataset(config.dataset);
for (const sample of dataset) {
for (let i = 0; i < config.iterations; i++) {
const startTime = performance.now();
try {
const result = await booster.applyEdit({
originalCode: sample.original,
editSnippet: sample.edit,
language: sample.language,
});
const latency = performance.now() - startTime;
// Validate result
const isCorrect = validateResult(result.mergedCode, sample.expected);
const syntaxValid = checkSyntax(result.mergedCode, sample.language);
results.push({
sample_id: sample.id,
iteration: i,
variant: config.variant,
model: config.model,
latency_ms: latency,
correct: isCorrect,
syntax_valid: syntaxValid,
confidence: result.confidence,
strategy: result.strategy,
cost_usd: 0, // Always $0
timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
});
} catch (error) {
results.push({
sample_id: sample.id,
iteration: i,
variant: config.variant,
error: error.message,
latency_ms: performance.now() - startTime,
correct: false,
syntax_valid: false,
});
}
}
}
return aggregateResults(results);
}
```
### Variants to Test
#### 1. Native Addon (napi-rs)
- **Platform**: Node.js on native hardware
- **Expected**: Fastest (30-50ms)
#### 2. WASM
- **Platform**: Node.js with WASM
- **Expected**: Medium (50-100ms)
#### 3. TypeScript Fallback
- **Platform**: Pure TypeScript (no Rust)
- **Expected**: Slower (100-200ms)
## 📊 Metrics to Collect
### Performance Metrics
```typescript
interface PerformanceMetrics {
// Latency
latency_p50: number; // Median
latency_p95: number; // 95th percentile
latency_p99: number; // 99th percentile
latency_max: number; // Maximum
latency_min: number; // Minimum
latency_mean: number; // Average
latency_stddev: number; // Standard deviation
// Throughput
throughput_edits_per_sec: number;
throughput_tokens_per_sec: number;
// Memory
memory_peak_mb: number;
memory_avg_mb: number;
// Startup
cold_start_ms: number;
warm_start_ms: number;
}
```
### Accuracy Metrics
```typescript
interface AccuracyMetrics {
// Overall
accuracy_exact_match: number; // Exact code match
accuracy_semantic_match: number; // Semantically equivalent
accuracy_syntax_valid: number; // Valid syntax
// By complexity
accuracy_simple: number; // Simple edits
accuracy_medium: number; // Medium edits
accuracy_complex: number; // Complex edits
// Confidence correlation
confidence_avg: number;
confidence_accuracy_correlation: number;
// Error rates
false_positive_rate: number;
false_negative_rate: number;
syntax_error_rate: number;
}
```
### Cost Metrics
```typescript
interface CostMetrics {
cost_per_edit: number;
cost_total: number;
cost_saved_vs_baseline: number;
cost_saved_percentage: number;
// Token usage (for LLM baselines)
tokens_per_edit_avg: number;
tokens_input_avg: number;
tokens_output_avg: number;
}
```
## 📈 Comparison Analysis
### Statistical Tests
```typescript
interface ComparisonAnalysis {
// Speed comparison
speedup_factor: number; // Agent Booster vs Morph
speedup_confidence_interval: [number, number];
speedup_p_value: number; // T-test significance
// Accuracy comparison
accuracy_difference: number; // Percentage points
accuracy_significance: boolean; // Statistically significant?
// Cost savings
cost_savings_per_edit: number;
cost_savings_per_1000_edits: number;
break_even_point: number; // Number of edits to break even
// Quality metrics
quality_score: number; // Weighted score (accuracy + speed)
recommended_use_cases: string[];
}
```
### Visualization
```typescript
// Generate comparison charts
async function generateCharts(results: BenchmarkResults) {
await generateLatencyChart(results);
await generateAccuracyChart(results);
await generateCostChart(results);
await generateConfidenceDistribution(results);
await generateComplexityBreakdown(results);
}
```
## 🎯 Benchmark Execution Plan
### Phase 1: Baseline (Week 1)
```bash
# 1. Setup Morph LLM account and get API key
export MORPH_API_KEY=sk-morph-xxx
# 2. Prepare datasets
npm run benchmark:prepare-datasets
# 3. Run Morph + Claude Sonnet 4 baseline
npm run benchmark:baseline -- --model claude-sonnet-4 --iterations 3
# 4. Run Morph + Claude Opus 4 baseline
npm run benchmark:baseline -- --model claude-opus-4 --iterations 3
# 5. Run Morph + Claude Haiku 4 baseline
npm run benchmark:baseline -- --model claude-haiku-4 --iterations 3
# 6. Analyze baseline results
npm run benchmark:analyze-baseline
```
**Expected Duration**: 8-12 hours (100 samples × 3 iterations × 3 models × 6s)
**Expected Cost**: ~$30-50 (300 edits × $0.01-0.02 per edit)
### Phase 2: Agent Booster (Week 2)
```bash
# 1. Build Agent Booster
cargo build --release
npm run build
# 2. Download embedding models
npm run download-models
# 3. Run native addon benchmarks
npm run benchmark:agent-booster -- --variant native --iterations 10
# 4. Run WASM benchmarks
npm run benchmark:agent-booster -- --variant wasm --iterations 10
# 5. Run TypeScript fallback benchmarks
npm run benchmark:agent-booster -- --variant typescript --iterations 10
# 6. Analyze Agent Booster results
npm run benchmark:analyze-agent-booster
```
**Expected Duration**: 1-2 hours (100 samples × 10 iterations × 3 variants × 50ms)
**Expected Cost**: $0
### Phase 3: Comparison (Week 3)
```bash
# 1. Generate comparison analysis
npm run benchmark:compare
# 2. Generate charts and visualizations
npm run benchmark:visualize
# 3. Generate HTML report
npm run benchmark:report
# 4. Publish results
npm run benchmark:publish
```
## 📋 Expected Results
### Latency Comparison
| Metric | Morph + Sonnet 4 | Agent Booster (Native) | Improvement |
|--------|------------------|------------------------|-------------|
| **p50** | 5,800ms | 35ms | **166x faster** |
| **p95** | 8,200ms | 52ms | **158x faster** |
| **p99** | 12,000ms | 85ms | **141x faster** |
| **Max** | 18,000ms | 150ms | **120x faster** |
### Accuracy Comparison
| Complexity | Morph + Sonnet 4 | Agent Booster | Difference |
|------------|------------------|---------------|------------|
| **Simple** | 99.2% | 98.5% | -0.7% |
| **Medium** | 97.8% | 96.2% | -1.6% |
| **Complex** | 96.1% | 93.8% | -2.3% |
| **Overall** | 98.0% | 96.8% | -1.2% |
### Cost Comparison (1000 edits)
| Solution | Total Cost | Cost per Edit | Savings |
|----------|-----------|---------------|---------|
| **Morph + Sonnet 4** | $10.00 | $0.010 | - |
| **Morph + Opus 4** | $20.00 | $0.020 | - |
| **Agent Booster** | $0.00 | $0.000 | **100%** |
### Recommended Configuration
Based on benchmarks, recommend:
```typescript
// For maximum performance
const config = {
primaryMethod: 'agent-booster',
model: 'jina-code-v2',
confidenceThreshold: 0.65,
fallbackToMorph: true,
morphModel: 'claude-sonnet-4'
};
// Expected results with 1000 edits:
// - 850 edits via Agent Booster (85%, avg 40ms, $0)
// - 150 edits via Morph fallback (15%, avg 6000ms, $1.50)
// - Overall avg latency: 934ms (vs 6000ms pure Morph)
// - Overall cost: $1.50 (vs $10 pure Morph)
// - 6.4x faster, 85% cost savings
```
## 📊 Benchmark Report Template
```markdown
# Agent Booster Benchmark Report
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Version**: agent-booster@0.1.0
**Dataset**: 100 samples (40 simple, 40 medium, 20 complex)
**Iterations**: 3 per sample (baseline), 10 per sample (Agent Booster)
## Executive Summary
- **Speed**: Agent Booster is **166x faster** than Morph + Claude Sonnet 4
- **Accuracy**: 96.8% vs 98.0% (-1.2 percentage points)
- **Cost**: **100% savings** ($0 vs $0.01 per edit)
- **Recommendation**: Use Agent Booster with fallback for best ROI
## Detailed Results
[Charts and tables here]
## Conclusions
[Analysis and recommendations]
```