# Agent Booster: Benchmark Methodology ## 🎯 Benchmark Goals 1. **Establish baseline** - Measure Morph LLM performance with Anthropic models 2. **Measure speedup** - Quantify Agent Booster performance improvements 3. **Validate accuracy** - Ensure quality is maintained or improved 4. **Calculate savings** - Demonstrate cost reduction 5. **Identify limitations** - Understand where Agent Booster excels vs struggles ## 📊 Benchmark Suite Structure ``` benchmarks/ ├── datasets/ # Test code samples │ ├── javascript/ │ │ ├── simple/ # 40 samples │ │ ├── medium/ # 40 samples │ │ └── complex/ # 20 samples │ ├── typescript/ │ ├── python/ │ └── rust/ │ ├── baselines/ # Morph LLM baselines │ ├── morph-claude-sonnet-4.ts │ ├── morph-claude-opus-4.ts │ └── morph-claude-haiku-4.ts │ ├── agent-booster/ # Agent Booster tests │ ├── native-addon.ts │ ├── wasm.ts │ └── typescript-fallback.ts │ ├── results/ # Benchmark outputs │ ├── raw/ # Raw JSON results │ ├── analysis/ # Processed results │ └── reports/ # HTML/PDF reports │ └── scripts/ ├── run-all.sh # Run full suite ├── run-baseline.sh # Morph LLM only ├── run-agent-booster.sh # Agent Booster only ├── compare.ts # Generate comparison └── visualize.ts # Create charts ``` ## 📝 Test Datasets ### Simple Edits (40 samples per language) **Characteristics:** - Single function/method modifications - Clear, unambiguous edit descriptions - < 50 lines of code - Expected accuracy: 99%+ **Examples:** 1. **Add parameter** ```typescript // Original function greet(name: string) { return `Hello, ${name}!`; } // Edit: "add optional greeting parameter with default 'Hello'" // Expected function greet(name: string, greeting: string = 'Hello') { return `${greeting}, ${name}!`; } ``` 2. **Add error handling** ```typescript // Original function parseJSON(text: string) { return JSON.parse(text); } // Edit: "add try-catch error handling" // Expected function parseJSON(text: string) { try { return JSON.parse(text); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to parse JSON:', error); return null; } } ``` 3. **Rename variable** ```typescript // Edit: "rename 'data' to 'userData'" ``` 4. **Add return type** ```typescript // Edit: "add explicit return type annotation" ``` 5. **Add JSDoc comment** ```typescript // Edit: "add JSDoc documentation" ``` ### Medium Edits (40 samples per language) **Characteristics:** - Multi-line function bodies - Some ambiguity in edit description - 50-200 lines of code - Expected accuracy: 95%+ **Examples:** 1. **Convert to async/await** ```typescript // Edit: "convert promises to async/await" ``` 2. **Add input validation** ```typescript // Edit: "add parameter validation for email format" ``` 3. **Extract helper function** ```typescript // Edit: "extract password hashing logic into separate function" ``` 4. **Add type safety** ```typescript // Edit: "replace 'any' types with proper types" ``` ### Complex Edits (20 samples per language) **Characteristics:** - Architectural changes - Multiple functions affected - 200+ lines of code - Expected accuracy: 85%+ **Examples:** 1. **Refactor to design pattern** ```typescript // Edit: "refactor to use Strategy pattern for authentication" ``` 2. **Add dependency injection** ```typescript // Edit: "convert to use dependency injection for database" ``` 3. **Extract class** ```typescript // Edit: "extract user validation into separate class" ``` ## ⚡ Baseline: Morph LLM Performance ### Test Configuration ```typescript // benchmarks/baselines/morph-claude-sonnet-4.ts import Anthropic from '@anthropic-ai/sdk'; const MORPH_API_KEY = process.env.MORPH_API_KEY; const MORPH_BASE_URL = 'https://api.morphllm.com/v1'; interface MorphBenchmarkConfig { model: 'claude-sonnet-4' | 'claude-opus-4' | 'claude-haiku-4'; morphModel: 'morph-v3-fast' | 'morph-v3-large'; dataset: string; iterations: number; } async function benchmarkMorph(config: MorphBenchmarkConfig) { const client = new Anthropic({ apiKey: MORPH_API_KEY, baseURL: MORPH_BASE_URL, }); const results = []; const dataset = loadDataset(config.dataset); for (const sample of dataset) { for (let i = 0; i < config.iterations; i++) { const startTime = performance.now(); const response = await client.messages.create({ model: config.morphModel, max_tokens: 4096, messages: [{ role: 'user', content: formatMorphPrompt(sample.original, sample.edit), }], }); const latency = performance.now() - startTime; const mergedCode = response.content[0].text; // Validate result const isCorrect = validateResult(mergedCode, sample.expected); const syntaxValid = checkSyntax(mergedCode, sample.language); // Calculate cost const cost = calculateCost(response.usage); results.push({ sample_id: sample.id, iteration: i, model: config.model, morph_model: config.morphModel, latency_ms: latency, correct: isCorrect, syntax_valid: syntaxValid, cost_usd: cost, tokens_input: response.usage.input_tokens, tokens_output: response.usage.output_tokens, timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), }); // Rate limiting await sleep(1000); // 1 req/sec to be safe } } return aggregateResults(results); } function formatMorphPrompt(original: string, edit: string): string { return `${edit} ${original} Apply the edit`; } function calculateCost(usage: { input_tokens: number; output_tokens: number }): number { // Claude Sonnet 4 pricing (example) const inputCost = (usage.input_tokens / 1000) * 0.003; const outputCost = (usage.output_tokens / 1000) * 0.015; return inputCost + outputCost; } ``` ### Anthropic Models to Test #### 1. Claude Sonnet 4 (claude-sonnet-4-20250514) - **Use Case**: Production default (best balance) - **Expected Performance**: 6000ms latency, 98% accuracy - **Cost**: ~$0.01 per edit #### 2. Claude Opus 4 (claude-opus-4-20250514) - **Use Case**: Maximum accuracy - **Expected Performance**: 8000ms latency, 99% accuracy - **Cost**: ~$0.02 per edit #### 3. Claude Haiku 4 (claude-haiku-4-20250320) - **Use Case**: Speed-optimized - **Expected Performance**: 3000ms latency, 96% accuracy - **Cost**: ~$0.005 per edit ### Morph Model Variants #### 1. morph-v3-large - **Use Case**: Best accuracy - **Expected**: Slower but more accurate #### 2. morph-v3-fast - **Use Case**: Speed-optimized - **Expected**: Faster but slightly less accurate ## ⚡ Agent Booster Benchmarks ### Test Configuration ```typescript // benchmarks/agent-booster/native-addon.ts import { AgentBooster } from 'agent-booster'; interface AgentBoosterBenchmarkConfig { model: 'jina-code-v2' | 'all-MiniLM-L6-v2'; dataset: string; iterations: number; variant: 'native' | 'wasm' | 'typescript'; } async function benchmarkAgentBooster(config: AgentBoosterBenchmarkConfig) { const booster = new AgentBooster({ model: config.model, confidenceThreshold: 0.0, // Disable fallback for pure benchmark }); const results = []; const dataset = loadDataset(config.dataset); for (const sample of dataset) { for (let i = 0; i < config.iterations; i++) { const startTime = performance.now(); try { const result = await booster.applyEdit({ originalCode: sample.original, editSnippet: sample.edit, language: sample.language, }); const latency = performance.now() - startTime; // Validate result const isCorrect = validateResult(result.mergedCode, sample.expected); const syntaxValid = checkSyntax(result.mergedCode, sample.language); results.push({ sample_id: sample.id, iteration: i, variant: config.variant, model: config.model, latency_ms: latency, correct: isCorrect, syntax_valid: syntaxValid, confidence: result.confidence, strategy: result.strategy, cost_usd: 0, // Always $0 timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), }); } catch (error) { results.push({ sample_id: sample.id, iteration: i, variant: config.variant, error: error.message, latency_ms: performance.now() - startTime, correct: false, syntax_valid: false, }); } } } return aggregateResults(results); } ``` ### Variants to Test #### 1. Native Addon (napi-rs) - **Platform**: Node.js on native hardware - **Expected**: Fastest (30-50ms) #### 2. WASM - **Platform**: Node.js with WASM - **Expected**: Medium (50-100ms) #### 3. TypeScript Fallback - **Platform**: Pure TypeScript (no Rust) - **Expected**: Slower (100-200ms) ## 📊 Metrics to Collect ### Performance Metrics ```typescript interface PerformanceMetrics { // Latency latency_p50: number; // Median latency_p95: number; // 95th percentile latency_p99: number; // 99th percentile latency_max: number; // Maximum latency_min: number; // Minimum latency_mean: number; // Average latency_stddev: number; // Standard deviation // Throughput throughput_edits_per_sec: number; throughput_tokens_per_sec: number; // Memory memory_peak_mb: number; memory_avg_mb: number; // Startup cold_start_ms: number; warm_start_ms: number; } ``` ### Accuracy Metrics ```typescript interface AccuracyMetrics { // Overall accuracy_exact_match: number; // Exact code match accuracy_semantic_match: number; // Semantically equivalent accuracy_syntax_valid: number; // Valid syntax // By complexity accuracy_simple: number; // Simple edits accuracy_medium: number; // Medium edits accuracy_complex: number; // Complex edits // Confidence correlation confidence_avg: number; confidence_accuracy_correlation: number; // Error rates false_positive_rate: number; false_negative_rate: number; syntax_error_rate: number; } ``` ### Cost Metrics ```typescript interface CostMetrics { cost_per_edit: number; cost_total: number; cost_saved_vs_baseline: number; cost_saved_percentage: number; // Token usage (for LLM baselines) tokens_per_edit_avg: number; tokens_input_avg: number; tokens_output_avg: number; } ``` ## 📈 Comparison Analysis ### Statistical Tests ```typescript interface ComparisonAnalysis { // Speed comparison speedup_factor: number; // Agent Booster vs Morph speedup_confidence_interval: [number, number]; speedup_p_value: number; // T-test significance // Accuracy comparison accuracy_difference: number; // Percentage points accuracy_significance: boolean; // Statistically significant? // Cost savings cost_savings_per_edit: number; cost_savings_per_1000_edits: number; break_even_point: number; // Number of edits to break even // Quality metrics quality_score: number; // Weighted score (accuracy + speed) recommended_use_cases: string[]; } ``` ### Visualization ```typescript // Generate comparison charts async function generateCharts(results: BenchmarkResults) { await generateLatencyChart(results); await generateAccuracyChart(results); await generateCostChart(results); await generateConfidenceDistribution(results); await generateComplexityBreakdown(results); } ``` ## 🎯 Benchmark Execution Plan ### Phase 1: Baseline (Week 1) ```bash # 1. Setup Morph LLM account and get API key export MORPH_API_KEY=sk-morph-xxx # 2. Prepare datasets npm run benchmark:prepare-datasets # 3. Run Morph + Claude Sonnet 4 baseline npm run benchmark:baseline -- --model claude-sonnet-4 --iterations 3 # 4. Run Morph + Claude Opus 4 baseline npm run benchmark:baseline -- --model claude-opus-4 --iterations 3 # 5. Run Morph + Claude Haiku 4 baseline npm run benchmark:baseline -- --model claude-haiku-4 --iterations 3 # 6. Analyze baseline results npm run benchmark:analyze-baseline ``` **Expected Duration**: 8-12 hours (100 samples × 3 iterations × 3 models × 6s) **Expected Cost**: ~$30-50 (300 edits × $0.01-0.02 per edit) ### Phase 2: Agent Booster (Week 2) ```bash # 1. Build Agent Booster cargo build --release npm run build # 2. Download embedding models npm run download-models # 3. Run native addon benchmarks npm run benchmark:agent-booster -- --variant native --iterations 10 # 4. Run WASM benchmarks npm run benchmark:agent-booster -- --variant wasm --iterations 10 # 5. Run TypeScript fallback benchmarks npm run benchmark:agent-booster -- --variant typescript --iterations 10 # 6. Analyze Agent Booster results npm run benchmark:analyze-agent-booster ``` **Expected Duration**: 1-2 hours (100 samples × 10 iterations × 3 variants × 50ms) **Expected Cost**: $0 ### Phase 3: Comparison (Week 3) ```bash # 1. Generate comparison analysis npm run benchmark:compare # 2. Generate charts and visualizations npm run benchmark:visualize # 3. Generate HTML report npm run benchmark:report # 4. Publish results npm run benchmark:publish ``` ## 📋 Expected Results ### Latency Comparison | Metric | Morph + Sonnet 4 | Agent Booster (Native) | Improvement | |--------|------------------|------------------------|-------------| | **p50** | 5,800ms | 35ms | **166x faster** | | **p95** | 8,200ms | 52ms | **158x faster** | | **p99** | 12,000ms | 85ms | **141x faster** | | **Max** | 18,000ms | 150ms | **120x faster** | ### Accuracy Comparison | Complexity | Morph + Sonnet 4 | Agent Booster | Difference | |------------|------------------|---------------|------------| | **Simple** | 99.2% | 98.5% | -0.7% | | **Medium** | 97.8% | 96.2% | -1.6% | | **Complex** | 96.1% | 93.8% | -2.3% | | **Overall** | 98.0% | 96.8% | -1.2% | ### Cost Comparison (1000 edits) | Solution | Total Cost | Cost per Edit | Savings | |----------|-----------|---------------|---------| | **Morph + Sonnet 4** | $10.00 | $0.010 | - | | **Morph + Opus 4** | $20.00 | $0.020 | - | | **Agent Booster** | $0.00 | $0.000 | **100%** | ### Recommended Configuration Based on benchmarks, recommend: ```typescript // For maximum performance const config = { primaryMethod: 'agent-booster', model: 'jina-code-v2', confidenceThreshold: 0.65, fallbackToMorph: true, morphModel: 'claude-sonnet-4' }; // Expected results with 1000 edits: // - 850 edits via Agent Booster (85%, avg 40ms, $0) // - 150 edits via Morph fallback (15%, avg 6000ms, $1.50) // - Overall avg latency: 934ms (vs 6000ms pure Morph) // - Overall cost: $1.50 (vs $10 pure Morph) // - 6.4x faster, 85% cost savings ``` ## 📊 Benchmark Report Template ```markdown # Agent Booster Benchmark Report **Date**: YYYY-MM-DD **Version**: agent-booster@0.1.0 **Dataset**: 100 samples (40 simple, 40 medium, 20 complex) **Iterations**: 3 per sample (baseline), 10 per sample (Agent Booster) ## Executive Summary - **Speed**: Agent Booster is **166x faster** than Morph + Claude Sonnet 4 - **Accuracy**: 96.8% vs 98.0% (-1.2 percentage points) - **Cost**: **100% savings** ($0 vs $0.01 per edit) - **Recommendation**: Use Agent Booster with fallback for best ROI ## Detailed Results [Charts and tables here] ## Conclusions [Analysis and recommendations] ```